Ramanujan used an approach to q-series which is general and is
suggestive and can help to find new results, but somehow seems to be
practically unknown. I have been using it for a few years and decided
to give a few examples of how to apply it in practice. I have tried to
keep this as brief as possible and yet contain enough of the details
so that it suggests how to continue in the same direction. Details are
available on request.
There is no precise general definition of q-series that I
know of. However, it is usually an expression involving the variable
q and perhaps other variables in an infinite sum or product. I will
give the definition of the most important q-series which is as
fundamental to the theory of q-series as the exponential is to
differential calculus. Euler applied q-series to the theory of
partitions of integers. Later, Jacobi introduced q-series as a
basis for his theory of theta and elliptic functions with applications
to number theory.
The power series here are given in terms of the variable q
instead of the customary x. Ramanujan himself preferred the use
of the plain x, however there are some connections with elliptic
function theory where q=e^{pi z} or else q=e^{2 pi z} is
commonly used. Jacobi introduced q-series in 1829 but did not name
them. By 1867, q was called the "nome" by Ole-Jacob Broch in his book
"Traite Elementaire des Fonctions Elliptiques". In the theory of
q-hypergeometric series q is sometimes called the "base".
To motivate the definition, recall the simplest converging
infinite series which is the geometric power series, the sum of all
nonnegative powers of x summing to 1/(1-x). We would like a
multiplicative analog of this series. One possibility is to use
1-x^{n} as the factors in the infinite product, but starting at
n=1 because 1-x^{0} = 1-1 = 0 would cause the product to vanish
immediately. Therefore we have the following definition.
Definition 1. The Ramanujan f function is defined by

f(-q) = (1-q)(1-q^{2})(1-q^{3})(1-q^{4}) ...

where |q| < 1 is required for convergence. Often, we use formal power
series and so all we need is that q^{n} converges to zero as n goes
to infinity. The reason for the f(-q) instead of the simpler f(q)
comes from Ramanujan's symmetric two variable theta function which is
Definition 2. The general two variable Ramanujan f function as
used in his notebooks is defined by him using the following series

where |ab| < 1 is required for convergence. The idea behind Ramanujan's
function is that it is a two-way infinite sum of terms in which the
quotient of consecutive terms is a geometric progression. Thus we have

This can be written with summation notation using an index variable
n summing a^{n(n+1)/2}b^{n(n-1)/2} over all integer n. Further,
and, surprisingly, it has an infinite product expression as follows

where q=ab. This is equivalent to Jacobi's triple product identity,
thus f(a,b) is an example of a q-series that has both infinite sum
and infinite product expressions.
In terms of f(a,b) Ramanujan's one variable theta function is

f(-q) = f(-q,-q^{2}) ,

which perhaps explains why Ramanujan used f(-q) instead of the more
obvious f(q). Since this can be confusing, I will use my own ad hoc
notation for this important function, writing it as

y(q) = f(-q) .

Euler used 1/y(q) as the generating function for the sequence of
partitions of non-negative integers. He found a striking pattern to the
power series expansion of y(q) which is

It appears that each term is a power of q with coefficients plus one
or minus one. The signs appear to alternate with two minus signs
followed by two plus signs and so on.
The pattern of the exponents may not be immediately obvious. Euler
found that they are the generalized pentagonal numbers. To make the
pattern even more obvious we can use the following method. We inflate
the exponents by replacing q by q^{24} and multiply by a factor q.
The result is

It appears that each exponent is a square number with the general
form of the exponent being (6k+1)^{2} where k is any integer including
negative integers, and the coefficient is (-1)^{k} . Thus, we can
write it as a two-way infinite series

Returning to y(q) we note that the exponents of q are both
even and odd but do not strictly alternate. They go through a pattern of
length eight. The exponents modulo three go through a pattern of length
six and all three residues occur. The exponents modulo five go through a
pattern of length ten and these results generalize.

2 Bisection, Trisection and Multisection of power series

This suggests that it might be interesting to split up the power
series into parts depending on the residue of the exponent modulo a
fixed modulus. For modulus two this is called bisection, and in the
general case it is called multisection. Note carefully that there is
another closely related version of multisection known as dissection in
which the sections need to be multiplied by powers of the variable and
the argument replaced by the n-th power of the variable in order to
become equal to multisection sections.
It is already interesting to try bisecting known series. For example,
bisecting the exponential power series gives the series for hyperbolic sine
and cosine. The general n-section case is given by Abraham Ungar in a
1982 American Mathematical Monthly article. Note that there is an algebraic
relation between the hyperbolic sine and cosine and also in Ungar's general
case. Also note that multisections can be expressed using n-th roots of
unity.
For the series A = y(q), applying bisection gives nothing
obvious, so we trisect the series into three others and find that

It is natural to look for algebraic relations between A_{0},A_{1},A_{2}, but
we need some algorithmic tools to find them. A few years ago I wrote
such tools in PARI-GP. Frank Garvan's q-series Maple package also has
similar tools. We start with two or more power series and the relation
tool can find algebraic relations given enough terms and computation.
While we will usually be finding homogeneous relations, it is easy to
find non-homogeneous relations by supplying 1 as an extra power series.
With A_{0},A_{1},A_{2}, by using only the coefficients from q^{0} up to q^{9},
and assuming there is a homogeneous cubic relation, the tool produces

It may be surprising that such a simple and symmetric relation holds,
and easily found, but after finding many hundreds of similar relations
it becomes more of a familiar phenomenon.
The proof of this relation depends on the trisection of y(q)^{3}
and leads to a 2007 result by Bruce Berndt and William Hart. Consider
the series y(q)^{3} with power series expansion

The striking pattern of alternating odd integer coefficients and the
triangular number exponents was known to Jacobi and resembles the
pattern for y(q) itself. We trisect the series and find that

Notice that A_{2} is zero and that A_{1} is similar to the original
power series. We will encounter situations like this later on. In
this case the fact that A_{2} is zero is precisely the cubic relation
that we previously found for the trisection of y(q) itself.
Let w be a non-trivial cube root of unity. Then we find that

which is essentially the identity of Berndt and Hart. Robin Chapman in
"An eta-function identity" did something similar using cube roots
of unity instead of multisection. He also generalized the result.

Notice that A_{3},A_{4} are zero and A_{1} is similar to the original
power series and this is like the previous y(q)^{3} case. Using the
coefficients from q^{0} to q^{5}, and assuming there is a homogeneous
quadratic relation, the relation tool produces

0 = A_{0}A_{2} + A_{1}^{2} .

This is simpler than the trisection of y(q), and probably this is
the only irreducible relation between the three power series. Now
Ramanujan essentially proves this relation using quintisection in a
fragment in the 1988 Narosa edition of the "Lost Notebook and Other
Unpublished Papers" on page 238, equations (20.1) to (20.4) and he
first gives Jacobi's identity on y(q)^{3} as equation (20.11). The
relation is an immediate consequence of a formula in Bruce Berndt,
"Ramanujan's Notebooks", Part III, page 82

f(-q) + qf(-q^{25}) = f(-q^{25})

ì í
î

f(-q^{15},-q^{10})

f(-q^{20},-q^{5})

- q^{2}

f(-q^{5},-q^{20})

f(-q^{15},-q^{10})

ü ý
þ

.

where we have the identifications

A_{0} = f(-q^{25})

f(-q^{15},-q^{10})

f(-q^{20},-q^{5})

and

A_{2} = -q^{2}f(-q^{25})

f(-q^{5},-q^{20})

f(-q^{15},-q^{10})

.

One immediate consequence of the quadratic relation we found is that
the two ratios

We look up the coefficients of this power series in Neil Sloane's OEIS
and discover it is sequence A007325 which is the Rogers-Ramanujan
continued fraction. More precisely this is given by
Definition 3. The Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction is defined by

It would be difficult to discover this property without being able to
search the OEIS. Combining previous equations we have

y(q)

qy(q^{25})

= 1/R(q^{5}) - 1 - R(q^{5}) .

where the left side is the generating function of sequence A096562.
Replacing q^{5} by q we get immediately

y(q^{1/5})

q^{1/5}y(q^{5})

= 1/R(q) - 1 - R(q) .

which is a known theorem about R(q). It is essentially equation (20.2)
in the Lost Notebook fragment mentioned earlier but written in terms of
f(-q). Another appearance is in Bruce Berndt, "Ramanujan's Notebooks",
Part III, page 267. More notably, on page 50 of the "Lost Notebook",
Ramanujan explictly exhibits both the 2-sections and 5-sections of the
Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction as well as of its reciprocal all
without any comment as usual. However, he uses the dissection form and
not the multisection form. This is proof that he sometimes used the
dissection form of multisection.

Maybe we were just lucky before, so naturally we wonder if we can
find something else equally interesting. One approach would be to try
a slightly more complicated product of q-series and see what happens.
Accordingly, let us try

We look up the coefficients of this power series in Sloane's OEIS and
discover it is sequence A092848 which is Ramanujan's cubic continued
fraction. More precisely this is given by
Definition 4. The Ramanujan cubic continued fraction is defined by

More properties are given in the "Lost Notebook" on page 366. Again,
it would be hard to discover this series had been studied before without
being able to search the OEIS. Combining previous equations we have

1 +

y(q)y(q^{2})

qy(q^{9})y(q^{18})

= 1/G(q^{3}) - 2G(q^{3}) .

where the left side is the generating function of sequence A058531 which
is the normalized McKay-Thompson series of class 18A for the Monster group
and the right side is a symmetrization formula for it.

Notice that A_{3},A_{4},A_{6} are zero so there are only four nonzero sections.
Using the coefficients from q^{0} to q^{19}, and assuming there is a
homogeneous cubic relation, the relation tool produces four relations

This relation appears in Ramanujan's second notebook on page 239, end
of entry 18(i). Several other 7-sections also appear on the same page.
Since the three factor product is 1 we can assume that

for some X,Y,Z. Rewriting the last three relations in terms of X,Y,Z
and simplifying we find the three are equivalent to the one relation

0 = X^{3}Y + Y^{3}Z + Z^{3}X

which is Klein's quartic curve. A clue could have come also from the
series expansion of A_{0}/A_{2} which is OEIS sequence A108483 and has a
reference to an article by William Duke published in 2005 which refers
to a chapter by Noam Elkies in a 1999 book on Klein's quartic curve.

The 7-section of y(q) also turns up in another context. In an
article by George E. Andrews, Anne Schilling, S. Ole Warnaar published
in 1999 is a theorem 5.2 with three equations and a comment that they
had not found a fourth such equation. I noticed that the three equations
given correspond to A_{0},A_{5},A_{2} of the 7-section of y(q), while the
remaining nonzero section A_{1} yields a fourth equation which was
discovered a few years later, a fact for which I am indebted to Ole
Warnaar. However, the connection to the 7-section apparently was unknown
until I found it in June 2006.
To illustrate this connection, find the power series expansion
of the infinite product in the first equation which we will write as

Comparing this with the 7-section of y(q) we see that A_{0} = B(q^{7}).
Exactly parallel reasoning holds for all four nonzero 7-sections of
y(q). Thus, the missing equation power series we will write as

The multisection of simple q-series examined by simple tools
lead to the discovery of results some of which have been known for
a long time, some only recently, as well as those which appear to be
new. However, these results do not require the extensive background
and advanced tools that the original discoveries required. This is a
good thing because it opens up a new world of results which would not
otherwise have been found except by those with specialized knowledge.
The multisection examples given are those encountered in simple
searches. There is no doubt in my mind that many others could now be
found, but there is no way to know until they are looked for. Ramanujan
himself explicitly and implicitly used multisection, but didn't really
emphasize or explain that he was doing so. I hope that I have shown how
easy it can be to discover interesting sequences and results in elliptic
function theory in the style of Ramanujan using only simple ideas in
algebra and a few simple computer tools.
I thank Emeric Deutsch, Robert Haas, and Ralf Stephan for helpful
comments, and Zhu Cao for turning part of this into a journal article.

File translated from
T_{E}X
by
T_{T}H,
version 3.82. On 30 Jan 2017, 21:45.